Ivan Schwartz T. 917 541 3617 Washington DC | ivan@studioeis.com
Elliot Schwartz T. 718 797 4561 Brooklyn New York
| elliot@studioeis.com
www.studioeis.com | www.bronzeworks.studioeis.com
Making Abraham Lincoln
Anew - and in Bronze.

An inspired collaboration has been taking shape at President Lincoln’s Cottage as part of the lead up to the Lincoln Bicentennial celebration.

View the slideshow >>


View The New York Times article >>

Washington developer Robert H. Smith is generously sponsoring a new sculpture memorializing Lincoln’s association with this important site to be completed before the end of 2008.

Mr. Smith’s proposal to place a new Lincoln sculpture at the recently restored summer cottage, that Lincoln occupied between 1862-64, will add great significance to StudioEIS’ historical works and has challenged the studio to find another dimension to the man who sat so formally for Brady’s camera.

In 1862 President Lincoln, heeding the advice of close advisors, made for higher ground - about three miles from the White House, where a slightly cooler summer could be had and he could find retreat from the White House, the heat and the war. Lincoln’s retreat also produced what is considered one of the
defining documents of his presidency – The Emancipation Proclamation - now thought to have been originally drafted during this period at the Cottage.

Developing an image of Lincoln and his trusted circuit horse was a little bit daunting: designing a suitable illustrative story that would eventually become the blueprint for this new sculpture would have to be found to make this new bronze sculpture a worthwhile endeavor.
Making a new image of Lincoln, precisely because he holds such an extraordinary place in American popular memory, was harder than one might have thought. No President, with the possible exceptions of Washington and JFK, has been as indelibly etched in our visual conscious-unconscious minds as Lincoln.

Designing this new sculpture has meant careful research resulting in a
synthesis of history and art where small revelations can still be had - even in the well-trodden area of classical sculpting. Our conversations with curators and historians at Ford’s Theater, The National Museum of American History, The Illinois Historical Society, and several Lincoln Museums along with equine & saddlery experts have contributed greatly to our understanding of Lincoln, and in the course of our study, we have also measured some of Lincoln’s clothing including his extraordinary and iconic top hat, examined the original Volk life-mask and casts of his hands, and looked at every photograph made of him. Funnily enough, many believed that a photograph of Lincoln existed showing him riding a horse, which, as it turned out, was not the case.

I began the quest for an image by considering the fact that Lincoln was photographed in
66 separate sittings demonstrating measured forbearance, and a willingness to take advantage of photography’s potential political usefulness. These formal images we have come to know him by suggest only a side or one window into the Lincoln personality, and they are consistent with most photographs made in formal sittings during that period. It became easier to find the hint of a new image for the sculpture when considering those facts. Our initial sketches were probably not a fiction, meaning we all believed this could have, and most likely did happen, but nor can it be empirically represented as having had its origins in photographic documentation.

The serious and stoic face we know so well from the
Brady and Gardiner photographs was likely not the only face of Lincoln. Reading anecdotal accounts and encounters with the President suggests otherwise, and there is an inkling of this in these formal portrait photos, but just an inkling.

Coincidentally, representing
18th century Americans like Washington or Jefferson today begins with even greater restriction. The merest suggestion or adaptation of a smile might be at perilous variance with historical representation, and would therefore be unthinkable to suggest changing the visual record unless one wanted to create a caricature, cartoon, or intentionally risk creating a work of revisionist history.

When Larry Rivers created his iconic painting - Washington Crossing the Delaware (1953) this picture became an instant curiosity but no one suggested the picture offered new revelations about the character of George Washington. Indeed the making of new versions of history’s most celebrated, is often rejected by historians and curators as re-hash or much along the line of actors playing iconic roles made wildly famous by others – Imagine some lesser mortal than Brando playing Stanley Kowalski in Tennessee Williams Streetcar Named Desire – it’s best not to try!

Artists can be mere interpreters, often doing it badly, or add significantly to interpretive history and the visual record with the potential to inspire greater inquiry about those individuals who are being portrayed. Naturally, one hopes for the latter in the case of this sculpture. Gilbert Stuart, Benjamin West, John Trumbull & Houdon, to name a few, did the job of picturing history extremely well. If there’s nothing to add to their interpretations it probably is better not to try.

But diligence can have its rewards, especially when you realize that the majority of works representing the founding period and subsequent periods prior to photography were often copies of copies which did much to create the phenomenon I call the “string telephone.” Minor variations and imperfections led to something totally different in feeling and meaning after a century of layering one incorrect move on top of another– we see this all the time in the images of Washington, and even more dramatically in the copies of Michelangelo’s David. What you can buy as a gift shop item bears little real resemblance to either the original work, in the case of Michelangelo, or the real man in the case of Washington.

Lincoln, in my view, might be seen as the first ‘modern’ president and by that I mean he is no longer separated from us as 18th century Americans were - by a lack of common context. Men all wear long pants, and an industrialized-ing America has gone to war, something all too familiar, and made so during the civil war by the advent of photography.

Photography made him accessible
and this extensive photo documentation is also at the heart of speculation about everything from Lincoln’s depressions to what physical illnesses he was afflicted by. Interestingly enough, paintings of Lincoln pale when compared to the photographic record. Interpreting Lincoln visually has been a largely unsuccessful artistic pursuit, as far as most painting and sculpture is concerned-although, many have prospered reproducing the sub-verbal message that is inherent in the image of Lincoln - that there are those amongst us who are in possession and in control of a moral high-ground. Lincoln was nothing, if not the embodiment and realization of such high minded purpose - it is precisely this message that is transmitted through the images of Lincoln, which is why any addition to the visual record can be only slightly at variance; in Lincoln’s case the image we conjure of our 16th President and hold dear, is totally in synch with the historical record; no doubt part of the reason he remains number one in the hearts and minds of the majority of Americans.

It was therefore possible, when searching for a compelling action for this sculpture, to imagine Lincoln doing something that he was never represented as having done-nothing inherently and spectacularly interesting, but something which led to the concept of Lincoln in a subtle and quieter moment - either about to mount or just having dismounted his horse, perhaps being called by someone in his Presidential guard or possibly a member of the family - with one hand on the saddle.

He was in two places at the same time, much as we often are today. Perhaps this one simple idea is what may give this sculpture the power to connect with people today – the action resides believably in all of our subconscious minds – one is often distracted – doing simple or mundane things –even America’s most important President. The revelation…and hardly a small thing, resides in our historical knowledge that Lincoln was indeed thinking of other things-some of which are only coming full circle today 146 years later.


Ivan Schwartz
Founder and Director, StudioEIS


With special thanks to:

Robert H. Smith
Richard Moe, President, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, Washington, DC
Frank Milligan, Director, President Lincoln’s Cottage, Washington, DC
Erin Carlson Mast, Curator, President Lincoln’s Cottage, Washington, DC
Harry Rubenstein, Chair, Division of Politics and Reform, the National Museum of American History, Washington, DC
James Cornelius, Curator, Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library and Museum, Springfield, IL
Gloria Swift, Curator, Ford’s Theater, Washington, DC
Jenifer Stermer, Curator of Collections, International Museum of the Horse, Lexington, KY
Cindy Van Horn, Registrar, the Lincoln Museum, Fort Wayne, IN
Joan Flinspach, President and CEO, the Lincoln Museum, Fort Wayne, IN
Stephen Perkins, Sculptor, Instructor, the Grand Central Academy, NYC
Kenneth McPheeters, Author the American Military Saddle, expert in antique militaria, San Antonio, TX
Gail Cunard, Executive Director, the Harness Racing Museum, Goshen, NY
Rebecca Howard, Manager, Historic Collections, the Harness Racing Museum, Goshen, NY
Bill Cooke, Director, the International Museum of the Horse, Lexington, KY
Stuart Wiliamson, Sculptor, Quito Ecuador